#Journaly linux upgrade
#Journaly linux series
#Journaly linux windows

#Journaly linux series

I loved Dave Taylor's 'Work the Shell' series about practical and sometimes magical scripts written for the Bash shell. Over the years, I have enjoyed reading many article series from regular contributors. I’ve written several articles including essays on usability in open source software, Bash shell scripting tricks, and C programming how-tos.īut my contributions to Linux Journal are meager compared to others. In time, I contributed my own stories to Linux Journal. I was glad to discover Linux Journal in those early days, and I quickly became a subscriber. With a combination of tutorials and technical articles, we hope to satisfy the needs of both these groups.'

#Journaly linux upgrade

The other segment is the DOS user who wants to upgrade to a multi-user system. Lots of the current Linux users have worked professionally with Unix. In the first issue, Hughes highlighted both groups of users as the audience Linux Journal was looking for, writing: 'We see this part of our audience as being two groups. The editors realized that a purely technical magazine would lose too many new users, while a magazine written for 'newbies' would not attract a more focused audience. Linux Journal also went for a broad audience. Anyone could contribute, and the editors acted as 'maintainers' to ensure content was top quality and informative. In a way, Linux Journal used a model similar to open source software. Instead, they invited others to write about Linux and share what they had learned. Hughes and Young were not the only contributors to the magazine.

#Journaly linux windows

Windows NT and OS/2' by Bernie Thompson.įrom the start, Linux Journal aimed to be a community-driven magazine. The first issue featured an ' Interview With Linus, The Author of Linux' by Robert Young, and an article comparing ' Linux Vs. In March 1994, Phil Hughes and Red Hat co-founder Bob Young published a new magazine about Linux, named Linux Journal. So, it was awesome to learn about a print magazine that was dedicated to all things Linux. I shared what I knew about Linux with those around me, and we pooled our Linux fu. Certainly, there was an online community via Usenet, but there weren’t many other ways to get together with other Linux users-unless you had a local Linux User Group in your area. In those early days, it felt like I was the only person who knew about Linux.

Since then, I’ve run Linux at home-and even at work. I remember installing my first Linux distribution, SoftLanding Systems (SLS), and exploring the power of Linux on my ‘386 PC. I first discovered Linux in 1993, when I was an undergraduate physics student who wanted the power of Big Unix on my home PC. Hail-satan abrt-notification: System encountered a non-fatal error in ?()Īmusingly, there was no end in sight to these messages so I had to stop the service with sudo systemctl stop rvice.Įx’s and the oops, oops, oopses they haunt me. That quickly got the journal back up and running, but the following ominous messages started pouring out from the Automatic Bug Reporting Tool (ABRT): abrt-server: Preserving oops '.' because DropNotReportableOopses is 'no'Ībrt-notification: System encountered a non-fatal error in ?()Ībrt-dump-journal-oops: Reported 1 kernel oopses to AbrtĪbrt-server: Can't find a meaningful backtrace for hashing in '.'Ībrt-server: Preserving oops '.' because DropNotReportableOopses is 'no' In the end, I simply opted to purge them all. However, there is no “fix” for corrupted journal files. With the problem identified, the fix should have been (in my humble opinion) something along the lines of journalctl -repair for fsck sake. Running journalctl -verify returned several pages detailing what appeared to be severe file corruption:Ĭhecking the journal files for internal consistency (machine ID has since been changed). The consistency checkĪfter browsing man journalctl I found that the -verify command can check the journal file for internal consistency. However, systemctl status rvice did insist that the journal was running just fine. But alas, and to my surprise, a reboot did not bring the journal service back to life.

My experience with troubleshooting enterprise Linux on the desktop has taught me to always reboot the system before addressing any underlying issue. The most recent entry simply contained information about the previous shutdown. Therefore, it immediately caught my attention when the systemd journal offered zero new lines of output. I always keep a terminal window open to monitor system logs in real-time when I’m in front of my computer.